![]() Of Graham’s evidence, applying a four-factor test set forth in Johnson v. § 1983.” Theĭistrict Court granted the officers’ motion for a directed verdict at the close Stop, in violation of “rights secured to him under the FourteenthĪmendment to the United States Constitution and 42 U.S.C. § 1983Īgainst the officers, alleging that they had used excessive force in making the ![]() ![]() Learned that nothing had happened in the store. During theĮncounter, Graham sustained multiple injuries. Rebuffed attempts to explain and treat Graham’s condition. Police officers arrived on the scene, handcuffed Graham, and ignored or ![]() The pair to wait while he found out what had happened in the store. Leave the store, followed Berry’s car, and made an investigative stop, ordering Connor, aĬity police officer, became suspicious after seeing Graham hastily enter and Hurried out and asked Berry to drive him to a friend’s house instead. Upon entering the store and seeing the number of people ahead of him, Graham ![]() Store to purchase orange juice to counteract the onset of an insulin reaction. Under the Court’s decision, courts must apply the objective reasonableness standard to the particular facts and circumstances of the case.Ī diabetic, asked his friend, William Berry, to drive him to a convenience Supreme Court established the legal framework for evaluating excessive force claims against law enforcement officers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |